Eminent Domain Report

When a lawsuit involves both inverse condemnation claims and other tort claims, trial courts often bifurcate the proceedings. A recent unpublished opinion from the Third District Court of Appeal, Rainey v. Nevada Irrigation District, 2026 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 231, addresses what happens when findings made in the first phase resolve factual issues common to the claims reserved for the second phase.

Background

Two neighboring property owners sued the Nevada Irrigation District, alleging that water leaking and seeping from the District’s irrigation ditch caused landslides ...

In Washington State, when a public agency determines it needs to acquire property for a public project, the agency will work directly with the private property owner to negotiate a purchase price for the property rights needed. However, if the agency reaches an impasse in the negotiations with the property owner, the public agency may turn to its eminent domain power and initiate a condemnation lawsuit. A condemnation lawsuit triggers the formal legal process for the agency to take private property for a public purpose without the owner’s consent in exchange for payment of just ...

This seems like common sense, but a public agency cannot pursue an inverse condemnation cause of action for damages suffered from its own public improvements. Yet that is exactly what the County of Santa Cruz recently attempted against another local public agency. The Court denied leave to amend to add an inverse condemnation cause of action and left unanswered a significant policy question on whether a public agency can pursue a claim for inverse condemnation at all, or whether inverse condemnation only applies to damages to private (not public) property. … 

On the first day of Christmas my client came to me and asked: “who holds title to the partridge in a pear tree that is within our new proposed right-of-way?” I replied that a partridge is a wild animal and not typically subject to private ownership, however if the landowner claims it is a “pet”, it would be considered personal property.

On the second day of Christmas, my client asked me “what do we do if we find two turtle doves on the property that we need to condemn for a new highway?” I said let’s get a right-of-entry from the landowner to do a survey and environmental testing and ...

During the past several years, we’ve been following an eminent domain case playing out in Mendocino County related to the Skunk Train. In 2023, the court concluded that the Skunk Train operator, Mendocino Railway, did not have the right to take property because it was not proposing to put the property to a public use. In a recent unpublished opinion, the Court of Appeal revisited this conclusion, and addressed whether a railroad corporation qualified as a public utility with the authority to exercise eminent domain, and what evidentiary showing is required to establish public use ...

Conservation easements generally preserve land in a predominantly natural or agricultural state. The efforts behind these easements often go unappreciated. The same is true for the notice requirements that correspond with the acquisition of property encumbered by a conservation easement. Failing to heed these notice requirements can impede acquisition efforts and add cost and delay to public projects.

Code of Civil Procedure section 1240.055 sets forth valuation and notice requirements for acquiring conservation easements under threat of condemnation in California.* It ...

Public utilities rely on access to private and public land to build and maintain essential infrastructure. Understanding the right-of-way and condemnation process enables utilities to secure land legally, avoid delays and maintain a balance between operational needs and property owners’ rights. Without a firm understanding of this basis, projects may be delayed, costs can quickly rise and risk exposure increases.

Any acquisition has two parts: (1) the pursuit of a negotiated acquisition through the pre-condemnation process and (2) the involuntary condemnation of the ...

We recently detailed Senate Bill 254, which overhauls California’s approach to wildfires. In addition to promoting new transmission facilities, replenishing the wildfire fund, streamlining the siting process and exempting underground plans, there was a notable addition that has not received as much attention: the Natural Catastrophe Resilience Study. There’s a great article by Travis Ritchie, California Wonders if it is Doing Wildfire Risk All Wrong, that covers this topic. In particular, he notes that utilities in California are vulnerable to wildfire liability ...

During the past several years, California legislators have been pushing through new legislation to increase potential housing opportunities in California. In October, Governor Newsom signed California Senate Bill 79 (SB 79), which opens up new residential developments near rail and bus stations in major California communities. Specifically, SB 79 creates rules to override local zoning regulations related to height and density for sites near transit-oriented development stops and applies to the “urban transit communities” of Los Angeles, Orange, San Diego, Alameda ...

Public infrastructure projects typically take years of planning. And sound government forecasting necessitates identifying future roads or extensions on general plan documents. If a property owner decides to purchase property that is likely to be impacted by a future public project, once that project comes to fruition and it’s time to acquire the property, how does the valuation work? Do the appraisers consider the project and its impact on the property, or do they disregard it? This is a complicated, fact-intensive issue, and one that requires balancing eminent domain laws ...